Wittgenstein's Critical Physiognomy

Daniel Kirwan Wack

Abstract


In saying that meaning is a physiognomy, Wittgenstein invokes a philosophical tradition of critical physiognomy, one that developed in opposition to a scientific physiognomy. The form of a critical physiognomic judgment is one of reasoning that is circular and dynamic, grasping intention, thoughts, and emotions in seeing the expressive movements of bodies in action. In identifying our capacities for meaning with our capacities for physiognomic perception, Wittgenstein develops an understanding of perception and meaning as oriented and structured by our shared practical concerns and needs. For Wittgenstein, critical physiognomy is both fundamental for any meaningful interaction with others and a capacity we cultivate, and so expressive of taste in actions and ways of living. In recognizing how fundamental our capacity for physiognomic perception is to our form of life Wittgenstein inherits and radicalizes a tradition of critical physiognomy that stretches back to Kant and Lessing. Aesthetic experiences such as painting, poetry, and movies can be vital to the cultivation of taste in actions and in ways of living.

Keywords


Wittgenstein Ludwig; 20th century philosophy; ; action theory; philosophy of film; expression; physiognomy; meaning; practical knowledge; form of life

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References


Benjamin, W., 2003. “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility: Third Version”. In: W. Benjamin, H. Eiland, M. Jennings, eds., 2003. Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Vol. 4, 1938-1940. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Bergson, H., 1991. Matter and Memory, translated by N. Paul, W. Palmer. New York, NY: Zone Books.

Cavell, S., 2005. “What Photography Calls Thinking”. In: S. Cavell, W. Rothman, ed., 2005. Cavell on Film. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Finkelstein, D., 2003. Expression and the Inner. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Good, J., 2006. Wittgenstein and the Theory of Perception. London, UK: Continuum.

Hegel, G., 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit, translated by A. Miller. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Kant, I., 2007. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, translated by R. Louden. In: Kant, I., Louden, R., Zoller, G., eds., 2007. Anthropology, History, and Education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kripke, S., 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mulhall, S., 1990. On Being in the World: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects. New York, NY: Routledge.

Nietzsche, F., 2001. The Gay Science, translated by J. Nauckhoff, edited by B. Williams. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future, translated by J. Norman, edited by R. Horstmann. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wittgenstein, L., 1958. Philosophical Investigations, translated by G. Anscombe. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.

Zettel, translated by G. Anscombe, edited by G. Anscombe and G. von Wright. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Wright, C., 2001. “Wittgenstein’s Rule-Following Considerations and the Central Project of Theoretical Linguistics.” In: Rails to Infinity: Essays on Themes from Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share