Contemplating Evil

Mikel Burley

Abstract


Via a discussion of various ways in which putative descriptions or explanations can be deemed to be morally insensitive, this article investigates the role of “contemplation” in philosophy of religion and ethics, and especially in connection with the “problem of evil.” Focusing on the Wittgenstein-influenced methods of D. Z. Phillips, the question is considered whether a tension obtains between, on the one hand, a “contemplative conception of philosophy,” and on the other hand, the sort of critique of theodicy according to which the theodicist’s attempt to maintain a contemplative stance with respect to evil and suffering is morally corrupt.

Keywords


20th century philosophy; Wittgenstein Ludwig; evil; Phillips D.Z.; contemplative philosophy; religion; ethics

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Allen, C., 2011. Interview on Night Waves, BBC Radio 3, 31 May 2011.

Drury, M. O’C., 1984. “Conversations with Wittgenstein.” In R. Rhees, ed. Recollections of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 97–171.

Hauerwas, S., 1994. God, Medicine, and Suffering. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Lash, N., 1978. “Eternal Life: Life ‘after’ Death?” The Heythrop Journal, 19(3): 271–84.

Marx, K., 1994. “Theses on Feuerbach.” In his Selected Writings, ed. L. H. Simon. Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 98–101.

Phillips, D. Z., 1977. “The Problem of Evil.” In S. C. Brown, ed. Reason and Religion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 103–21.

Phillips, D. Z., 1992. “My Neighbour and My Neighbours.” In his Interventions in Ethics. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 229–50.

Phillips, D. Z., 1999. Philosophy’s Cool Place. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Phillips, D. Z., 2001. Religion and the Hermeneutics of Contemplation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Phillips, D. Z., 2004a. The Problem of Evil and the Problem of God. London: SCM Press.

Phillips, D. Z., 2004b. Religion and Friendly Fire: Examining Assumptions in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Phillips, D. Z., 2006. “Kill or Be Killed.” In his From Fantasy to Faith: Morality, Religion and Twentieth-Century Literature, 2nd edn. London: SCM Press, pp. 157–68.

Rhees, R., 1984. “Editorial Notes.” In R. Rhees, ed. Recollections of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 213–25.

Surin, K., 1986. Theology and the Problem of Evil. Oxford: Blackwell.

Swift, J., 1843. The Works of Jonathan Swift, Vol. 1. London: Bohn.

Swinburne, R., 1977. “The Problem of Evil.” In S. C. Brown, ed. Reason and Religion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 81–102.

Swinburne, R., 1998. Providence and the Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tilley, T. W., 1991. The Evils of Theodicy. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Tolstoy, L., 1960. The Death of Ivan Ilych and Other Stories, trans. A. Maude. New York: Signet.

Trakakis, N., 2008. “Theodicy: The Solution to the Problem of Evil, or Part of the Problem?” Sophia, 47(2): 161–91.

Trakakis, N., 2010. “Against Theodicy: A Response to Peter Forrest.” Sophia, 49(1): 129–40.

Trilling, L., 1961. “Introduction.” In Isaac Babel, Collected Stories. London: Penguin.

Williams, R., 1996. “Reply: Redeeming Sorrows.” In D. Z. Phillips, ed., Religion and Morality. New York: St Martin’s Press, pp. 132–48.

Winch, P., 1987. “Who Is My Neighbour?” In his Trying to Make Sense. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 154–66.

Wittgenstein, L., 1998. Culture and Value, ed. G. H. von Wright and H. Nyman, revised by A. Pichler, trans. P. Winch. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, L., 2007. Zettel, ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Wittgenstein, L., 2009. Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and J. Schulte, 4th edn. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.