The Trouble with Harry
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
FULLTEXT PDFReferences
Ekstrom, L., 2002. “Libertarianism and Frankfurt-style Cases”. In: Kane, pp. 309-22.
Fischer, J., 2002. “Frankfurt-type Examples and Semi-compatibilism”. In: Kane, p. 282.
Frankfurt, H., 2003. “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility”. In: G. Watson, ed. Free Will, 2nd ed. 2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 167-8.
Ginet, C., 1996. “In Defense of the Principle of Alternate
Possibilities: Why I Don’t find Frankfurt’s Argument Convincing”. Philosophical Perspectives, pp. 403-17.
Kane, R., 1996. The Significance of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 142-5.
Kane, R., ed. 2002. The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Katzoff, C., 2003. “The Selling of Joseph—A Frankfurtian Interpretation”. In: D. Widerker and M. McKenna, pp. 327-38.
Libet, B., 1985. “Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, pp. 529-66.
Locke, J., 1950 (originally published 1690). P.H. Nidditch, ed., An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mele, A and Robb D., 1998. “Rescuing Frankfurt-style Cases”. The Philosophical Review, pp. 97-112.
Stump, E., 2003. “Moral Responsibility without Alternative Possibilities”. In: Widerker and McKenna, p. 149.
Van Inwagen, P., 1983. An Essay on Free Will, 1983. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 155-6.
Widerker, D., 1995. “Libertarianism and Frankfurt’s Attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities”. Philosophical Review, pp. 247-61.
Widerker, D. and McKenna, M., eds. 2003. Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.